Running Backs (RB): Best “Losers” in Fantasy Football
The biggest difference between fantasy football and real football is that your team can consist of a bunch of losers and yet still blow the doors off your opponent. Sounds controversial? Not when you realize that I mean it literally. At the end of the day, we fantasy owners don’t really care whether the team’s our players suit up for get the WIN on Sunday, as long as our individual players rack up the stats. Sure, there is often a correlation between winning the game and putting up big offensive numbers, but it’s not always the case.
So just to get us back in the mindset of talking fantasy football, let’s take a moment to honor the best “losers” in fantasy football over the last 10 years.
Table 1: Best individual fantasy performances by a RB in a losing effort (1998-2007)
| Rank | First | Last | Year | Week | Team | Opp | Result | Rush | RuYds | Recs | RecYds | TDs | FPTs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Priest | Holmes | 2002 | 12 | KC | SEA | L,32-39 | 23 | 197 | 7 | 110 | 3 | 48.7 |
| 2 | Barry | Sanders | 1998 | 2 | DET | CIN | L,28-34 | 26 | 185 | 1 | 44 | 3 | 40.9 |
| 3 | Priest | Holmes | 2001 | 13 | KC | OAK | L,26-28 | 28 | 168 | 5 | 109 | 2 | 39.7 |
| 4 | Ronnie | Brown | 2007 | 3 | MIA | NYJ | L,28-31 | 23 | 112 | 6 | 99 | 3 | 39.1 |
| 5 | Priest | Holmes | 2002 | 3 | KC | NE | L,38-41 | 30 | 180 | 5 | 18 | 3 | 37.8 |
| 6 | Marshall | Faulk | 2000 | 16 | STL | TB | L,35-38 | 22 | 79 | 4 | 53 | 4 | 37.2 |
| 7 | Travis | Henry | 2002 | 1 | BUF | NYJ | L,31-37 | 31 | 149 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 35.8 |
| 8 | Ricky | Williams | 2002 | 13 | MIA | BUF | L,21-38 | 27 | 228 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 35.5 |
| 9 | Deuce | McAllister | 2003 | 12 | NO | PHI | L,20-33 | 19 | 184 | 4 | 48 | 2 | 35.2 |
| 10 | Deuce | McAllister | 2002 | 8 | NO | ATL | L,35-37 | 17 | 115 | 5 | 56 | 3 | 35.1 |
| 11 | Larry | Johnson | 2005 | 14 | KC | DAL | L,28-31 | 26 | 143 | 3 | 28 | 3 | 35.1 |
| 12 | Ahman | Green | 2003 | 10 | GB | PHI | L,14-17 | 29 | 192 | 3 | 32 | 2 | 34.4 |
| 13 | Marcel | Shipp | 2002 | 15 | ARI | STL | L,28-30 | 26 | 79 | 2 | 79 | 3 | 33.8 |
| 14 | Tim | Biakabutuka | 1999 | 4 | CAR | WAS | L,36-38 | 12 | 142 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 33.4 |
| 15 | LaDainian | Tomlinson | 2003 | 4 | SD | OAK | L,31-34 | 28 | 187 | 7 | 24 | 1 | 33.2 |
| 16 | Priest | Holmes | 2002 | 7 | KC | DEN | L,34-37 | 24 | 113 | 7 | 38 | 3 | 33.1 |
| 17 | Priest | Holmes | 2004 | 1 | KC | DEN | L,24-34 | 26 | 151 | 2 | -2 | 3 | 32.9 |
| 18 | LaDainian | Tomlinson | 2003 | 15 | SD | GB | L,21-38 | 20 | 51 | 11 | 144 | 2 | 31.5 |
| 19 | Clinton | Portis | 2002 | 13 | DEN | SD | L,27-30 | 23 | 159 | 3 | 34 | 2 | 31.3 |
| 20 | Ricky | Williams | 2002 | 17 | MIA | NE | L,24-27 | 31 | 185 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 31.2 |
The first thing that should jump out at you from this list is that talent trumps winning or losing. Some of the best RBs in the last decade appear multiple times on this list. The next thing I couldn’t help but notice is that Kansas City represents 30% (6 out of 20) of the list; which tells us two things we already knew…1) The Chiefs haven’t been a very good team over the last decade and 2) They’ve had excellent runners in spite of that.
Does this have any deep meaning for your fantasy draft preparation? No, it’s just a fun and quick use of our newest stat engine: The Game Log Dominator.
Next we’ll take a look at the best “Loser” WR performances.















