<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Randy Moss: Not tagged, but (probably) re-signed</title>
	<link>http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/02/21/randy-moss-not-tagged-but-probably-re-signed/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Football Info for Serious Fans</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Footballguys Blog &#187; Randy Moss: Breathe easy Pats fans, he didn&#8217;t get away after all</title>
		<link>http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/02/21/randy-moss-not-tagged-but-probably-re-signed/#comment-459</link>
		<author>Footballguys Blog &#187; Randy Moss: Breathe easy Pats fans, he didn&#8217;t get away after all</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/02/21/randy-moss-not-tagged-but-probably-re-signed/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>[...] When the Patriots opted not to tender Moss with the franchise designation, many (myself included) thought a long-term deal was already in place; but couldn&#8217;t be formally announced until the beginning of free agency. Yet, when the clock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When the Patriots opted not to tender Moss with the franchise designation, many (myself included) thought a long-term deal was already in place; but couldn&#8217;t be formally announced until the beginning of free agency. Yet, when the clock [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Footballguys Blog &#187; Franchise Tag: 2008 Recap</title>
		<link>http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/02/21/randy-moss-not-tagged-but-probably-re-signed/#comment-424</link>
		<author>Footballguys Blog &#187; Franchise Tag: 2008 Recap</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/02/21/randy-moss-not-tagged-but-probably-re-signed/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>[...] we discussed last night, not tagging Randy Moss is shocking only if they don&#8217;t already have a long-term deal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] we discussed last night, not tagging Randy Moss is shocking only if they don&#8217;t already have a long-term deal [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
